Who is being tortured?

Well, it looks like we are stuck on stupid. In an ironic twist of fate, today's coumn is about torture. (Kind of like reading this column week after week). If Gil was really all that concerned about torture, I would speculate that he could turn in his resignation to Lancaster Newspapers.

Today, it is mentioned that portions of a report were released "proving" terrorism is a growing threat and is spreading (even though we haven't faced a major attack here in five years).

Question: If "portions" of the report have been released, how can anything be made "clear" without reviewing the whole thing? It's almost like Democrats are taking excerpts, reading and projecting what they want to hear while ignoring the full story?

Sound familiar, Gil?

Of course, now we have the paranoid admission that it is believed we have "a legal framework by which dissent itself might be criminalized". Oh, I didn't realize that mass murdering 3,000 people on 9-11 was "dissent". Is blowing up planes "dissent"? Chopping off people's heads - "dissent"?

Is making veiled threats "dissent", Gil? Ask your boss what he thinks.



Is sprinkling someone with a watercan torture? Man, I must torture our flowers on a regular basis.

Question: why are we considering putting people who are not citizens of this country their "Constitutional rights"? Should they have Constitutional rights if they aren't citizens?

Can we destroy ourselves? Certainly. Those who are stuck on stupid can continue to run this country right into the ground with their boneheaded stubbornness.

Hopefully, most people will come to their senses and show others that it is intolerable on November.