Involuntary abnormal eye movement (out of sync):
Dr Ted Noel explains Hillary's abnormal eye movement and link to Parkinson's Disease:
Involuntary abnormal eye movement (out of sync):
Dr Ted Noel explains Hillary's abnormal eye movement and link to Parkinson's Disease:
The "racist lie" that Obama was not born in the US at all was started by staffers of Democrat Hillary Clinton. It is not a "racist lie" that Barack Obama's father was a citizen of Kenya. "Natural born" should mean that both of your parents are US citizens and that you were born in the US or in a territory of the US.
The Constitution requires the President to not just be a US Citizen. Article II Section 1 Clause 5 (the Natural Born citizen clause), specifically distinguishes Natural Born and a "citizen at the time of the adoption of the Constitution" (Obama was obviously not a citizen in 1787). It does not say that solely a US "citizen" can be President. It says that the President MUST be a natural born citizen. This was done to prevent a US President from having dual citizenship, as Barack Obama has. His father was Kenyan, therefore he may have some allegiance to the nation of Kenya. And Obama also has dual citizenship because he was a citizen of Indonesia as Barry Soetoro.
That is not racist, as anyone can legally immigrate to the United States and then have a "natural born citizen" child. If someone was white and their father was a citizen of Ireland, they would also be ineligible according to the plain language of the US Constitution. The simple fact is that Barack Obama is ineligible to be the President of the United States. If the Constitution needs to be changed, then legally do so. To override the law without changing it is not how this country should work. If so, I could go and override any law I found personally offensive or wrong. It just is not how things should work - and it doesn't. Doing so opens a can of worms that is just not going to end well.
Click the image to view it larger.
Shocking cellphone video captures events from inside Robert "Lavoy" Finicum's vehicle. FBI agents may have lied about not firing "mystery" shots.
The following video seems to contradict officials' statements that the shooting was "justified."
This video shows a retired cop discussing several issues with the tactics used by the officers. He refers to the roadblock as "illegal". He also points out that the police set up a crossfire encounter, which is very dangerous and would only be used if authorization to kill Finicum was granted beforehand.
The woman, who's also reportedly an activist with the "F–" Yo" flag movement, goes by the name of "Eye Empress Sekhmet" and also threatened to kill police, WSB-TV reported.
The YouTube video was removed once, but reposted at a blog site and picked up by the Gateway Pundit. It's entitled, "DECLARATION OF OPEN SEASON ON CRACKAS" and presses fellow activists to "take over" police stations.
Around the three and one-half minute mark, the woman makes an appearance on the video, outfitted in a camouflage jacket and carting a machete and handgun, and calls for "open season [on] crackas" as gunfire sounds echo in the background.
Record number of American families on food stamps - more Americans on food stamps than the entire population of Spain.
Twitter has exploded in recent days with violent threats targeting Republican presidential frontrunner Donald Trump.
While the left often accuses the right of engaging in vitriolic rhetoric, the number of threats directed against Trump far outweighs those leveled at Hillary Clinton.
A basic Twitter search for the terms “kill Donald Trump” and “murder Donald Trump” reveal a deluge of violent remarks directed at the Republican candidate in the aftermath of last week’s debate.
In comparison, similar threats against Clinton are almost non-existent.
Although the vast majority of the threats are obviously tongue-in-cheek, some of them come across as extremely menacing.
The DC "outsider" with only 4 mansions?
...and how is a disassembled Radio Shack alarm clock "science"?
I knew there had to be a reason that the President invited a student that made a clock to the White House. The clock a student "made" and took to school is a story that is starting to unravel and it is actually parts of a manufactured 1970s era digital alarm clock from Radio Shack.
Why does Obama wear a "wedding ring" with snakes on it? Why does he appear to have worn that ring before ever being married?
Wolf Blitzer: Carly Fiorina, she said if you want to stump a Democrat she said ask them about Hillary Clinton’s accomplishments as Secretary of State. If you were on that debate stage with her, what would you say was your number one accomplishment as Secretary of State?
Hillary Clinton: You know, Wolf, I didn’t get to see all of their debate. But I saw enough of it to know that this is just the usual back and forth political attacks, the kinds of things you say when you’re on a debate stage and really don’t have much else to say. I didn’t hear anything from any of them about how they’re going to make college more affordable or get down student debt or get equal pay for equal work for women, what they’re going to do to make sure that we deal with the challenges of raising incomes for hard working people. So I don’t really pay a lot of attention to this kind of rhetoric that heats up the debate stage. They’re all trying to vie for more attention from obviously the Republican Party. I’m going to let them decide how best to do it. But if anybody’s interested, you know, there’s a long list about what I have done. And I’m very proud of it. You can read my book Hard Choices, read about how I negotiated a cease-fire between Israel and Hamas. You can read about how I put together the coalition that led to international sanctions against Iran. You can read about what I did when I was First Lady, to get the children’s health insurance program or as senator working across the aisle on issues like getting better health care for our veterans. You know, this is just the silly season. I am looking forward to eventually debating on that stage whoever they finally nominate once they get around to doing that.
Case in point, there is still the strange phone call to Dave Aragon, as reported here by the Daily Mail. Keep in mind that Dave Aragon himself said he cannot prove that the call was made by James Holmes and that the person identifying themselves as James Holmes talked about "the Joker".
Some details online not widely reported on by the mainstream media are a series of faked Dave Aragon social media pages created on June 20, 2012 and a domain viewable on the internet archive called davearagon.com (referenced in the social media pages). The domain's content claims the site had been up and running either in April 2012 or possibly prior to that. The domain (type it into wayback machine here) also lists "Suffocator of Sins" at the top. These facts are often not mentioned in mainstream media.
Also, there is some interesting information about the alleged text message threats sent to Lynne Fenton a month prior to the shooting in this Youtube video. The reference that "Thomas Brinkley" is making about an asian accent is related to one of the strange blogs written by Jonathan Lee Riches (http://yeompholee.blogspot.com and http://yeompyolee.blogspot.com). Was the call made from someone pretending to be Yeom Pho Lee? Is that why he was initially a person of interest?
If this case interests you, I would really recommend watching this discussion. These alleged text message threats seem to have occurred close to the timeline of June 20, 2012, when all the social media pages appeared to have gone up.
There really seem to be some loose ends in this case that deserve further examination. Was someone else involved? I think it is appropriate at this point to ask.
There are some very strange connections which I document here.
There is still the matter of a clearly faked photo (Holmes face appears overlaid with a photo of a young Jack Nicholson), the Davearagon.com website (viewable on the Internet Archive Wayback Machine), and all of those faked Dave Aragon social media profiles created on June 20, 2012.
Did someone had prior knowledge of events to come. Who was it? James Holmes made a notebook, did he also discuss with others online what his plan was? Did he make these Dave Aragon social media pages? Was it someone else and somehow they backdated this to associate themselves in some twisted way?
I will be reviewing some of these issues in a future post.
I guess the point of my recent posts is to demostrate that our national media really has become an embarassment. Quite clearly, many left wing sites used this unfortunate event to attack "right wing extremism". And of course, it ends up that the perpetrators were involved with the Occupy/Anonymous movement - not the Tea Party. Now, the FBI has come out stating that this person is claiming responsibility - a "leader" of an anarchist group. In case the media doesn't know, anarchy is very left wing.
I think our media really needs to stop convicting certain groups or people for events before there is even a trial or even before facts come out. This unethical journalism has really spiralled out of control over the past few years. I consider the lying to be very dangerous and harmful and something really needs to be done to reign it in.
I've decided that the best way to approach this is to let this individual apparently tell you himself. I am not responsible for the content of this video or any related content. Remember, I am not telling you who made this video or what purposes they had. I am leaving that conclusion up to the reader.
This video is titled "Confessions of a Serial Killer" and is found on the Youtube Channel of "Iholmie Holmes".
This is the Google Profile of "Iholmie Holmes", which - in my opinion - confirms the owner of the account. You decide for yourself.
You may not immediately believe this video. It's shocking. It deviates from everything you've been told by media about the Aurora theater shooting in 2012. That's why over the passed few days I've been leaking some information, preparing any readers of this blog that not everything is as it seems regarding this case. You may think that this video cannot possibly be real or that someone is just playing a sick game. But I am about to reveal compelling evidence that could lead you to believe that it is true.
And yes, it is kind of mind blowing and scary. So if you are faint of heart, you might want to look away and read something else.
I became alerted to all of this in about April of 2014 when the woman threw the shoe at Hillary. Much of this information about that person's name was already online, but not in the mainstream news. A big source for me was Godlikeproductions forums. And the Denver Westword blog posts of Michael Roberts.
I realized pretty quickly that the name of the shoe thrower (Allison Michelle Ernst) tied to the Aurora theater shooting trial. I was even able to find a photo of the person in question who allegedly disrupted the trial and even filed a motion to intervene in the case.
This is a still shot from news footage found through GLP forums. And this is the order regarding the motion to intervene, revealing that the filer was an "impersonator".
This piqued my curiosity. I started finding out everything I could about the Aurora Theater shooting. I went on Youtube and found a video titled "Aurora Theater Investigators Targetted".
A name kept popping up that I had run across regarding the Allison Ernst blogs (mentioned on this blog in a previous post). (If you haven't noticed, I've avoided specifically using that name within this blog post). So I started Googling that name and cross referencing phrases from the blogs. I also took some tips from information posted on the Facebook page of the person these investigators said were targetting them. Again and again, I would find this same style of blog and the same type of wording. Here are some links to the things I was seeing.
For example, based on this Facebook photo, I google searched and found this. Christopher David Fortie Google Profile:
Of course, I found this - the man those Aurora investigators mentioned:
And this, one of the alleged names of the victims:
I started to realize this person that targetted the Aurora investigators was a felon who served time for identity theft/credit card fraud. Not only that, but while in prison, he became notorious for filing frivolous lawsuits. Then it hit me like a ton of bricks.
"The Joker". This guy is filing these lawsuits that people online are supposedly finding so hilarious. Then I started thinking about how much more this guy made sense as a suspect.
So much about what he was talking about in the blogs (such as the http://yeompyolee.blogspot.com and http://jonathanjolie.blogspot.com) actually started making sense in relation to the Batman films to me. It actually wasn't "gibberish" as it appeared at first - it was a sort of code that is just trying to come across as crazy gibbish. Here are some examples of what I mean.
The alleged "planted fingerprints" this guy mentioned in a few of the blogs; that happened in the movie - they planted Bruce Wayne's fingerprints to steal his money.
The courtroom appearance of Allison Ernst, a name shared with a CO defense attorney. This tied in with the character Two Face, in a way. Dressing up as a woman tied in with things the Joker character did in the movie. The reference to "Will the real Slim Shady please stand up?" was also a plot point of the film.
It was all plot points and part of the story in the previous Batman films leading up to the Dark Knight Rises. But this posting on http://jonathanjolie.blogspot.com that contains the Slim Shady phrase at the end of the post was date stamped July 2, 2012 - almost two weeks before the shooting happened. At this point for me, red flags went up.
On his Facebook page, he routinely called people and impersonated James Holmes. He attempted to call the White House collect to get a pardon for James Holmes. What if he impersonated James Holmes when he called Dave Aragon a month before the shooting?
That would be the potential proof I needed that showed that there was a serious issue here. I didn't expect I would actually find it. But I did.
This is a screenshot - it is NOT fake. If you go to that URL, you will see this page and it has those dates on it.
I realized that these were fake profiles - they do not belong to Dave Aragon. He has his own official Facebook page. The Twitter page is following a few celebrities - which ties in with this person who has been filing all the celebrity lawsuits. The Twitter user is following Kim Kardashian and Tom Cruise. When I cross-checked the blogs, I found:
If you check, there is indeed a lawsuit filed on June 18, 2012 by "Gino Romano" an online alias of the man targetting the Aurora investigators. There is also one filed for Tom Cruise filed on July 5, 2012 by "Slim Shady Holmes". Slim Shady is a term used by rapper Eminem to signify an evil alter ego.
And of course, there is a blog named that written in the same style and phrasing as all the others, signed with this person's name.
He doesn't make a lot of sense because how many fake social media pages of yourself have you created? And what purpose could he have had?
Another possibility is whoever was on the other end of the phone with Dave Aragon. Many have claimed it was James Holmes, but what if it was an impersonator? But let's consider James Holmes making these Dave Aragon social media pages for a moment. He would have to know this guy's blogging style to make the Dave Aragon blogspot. According to the Twitter page, he would have to know that the guy filed lawsuits against Tom Cruise and Kim Kardashian if he was trying to pin this guy on his plan. He would have had to have created all these other blogspots - some of which were created after he was put in jail. Does that logically make sense? Not really.
Also, the following Google profile seems to tie what was thrown on those papers by the Hillary shoe thrower regarding Operation Cynthia.
I would like to note that the media is feverishly attempting to modify the reason that the shoe was thrown. Now it was to bring attention to something about Afghanistan. Is it because "Operation Cynthia" makes the Patty Hearst connection? Notice the subtle similarity to the name "Allison Ernst" and "Patty Hearst"? Recall the multiple pictures of the man in a red dress? His Facebook post titled "James Eagen Holmes as Allison Ernst" even looks like he is posing as Patty Hearst.
I've noted all of this in a previous posting on this blog.
This, to me, tells the story. My gut feeling is that the wrong guy is sitting in jail waiting to go on trial for the death sentence. Could he have been set up by this self-confessed computer hacker, identity thief, credit card fraudster, and violent felon? I let it up to the reader to decide for themselves.
Original photo (mirror imaged):
Faked "photo ID" image
Transparent images superimposed for comparison
More details to come.
We were told that this cop killing in Vegas was done by "right wing extremists". But that appears to have been a bold-faced lie as more comes out about Amanda and Jerad's life in Indiana (where they came from). They have been pictured demostrating with the hacker group Anonymous and tied to Occupy, a largely left wing organization that attempted to rival the Tea Party.
These are pictures purported to be Jerad and Amanda Miller holding signs promoting the "Million Mask March" organized by Anonymous and stemming from the Occupy movement, largely recognized to be left wing groups.
Notice the timing of this cop killing incident, right before a major election where the Tea Party still managed to capture a major win by defeating Eric Cantor?
Infowars, thankfully, has already covered a lot about this story, showing how the man responsible for the crime was a known felon who used meth and there have been several photos and a video of the man dressed up acting like the "Joker". Please note that the "Joker" video with Jerad has him repeating a lot of right wing ideology about "tyranny", but it is done in the context of him acting "psychotic". In other words, Jerad's views were not right wing.
The video with the flag used as a backdrop (desecrating and mocking the American flag) is only one small example of why Jerad is clearly not right wing. The very incident involved him draping the Gadsden Flag over a corpse, laying it on the ground. Clearly, this is not something a true patriot would do.
A lot of evidence is mounting that this person was attempting to infiltrate the Bundy Ranch under the guise of being a right wing person. Another fact is that the Facebook logo he was using that said "Patriot" was stolen from a Marine Veteran website called "MisguidedChildren.com". It's clear that Jerad was not a veteran or a Marine, and was a known felon.
This is not the major story I am breaking, but it ties in, as you will see.