Ok, I hate to go over this again and again. But if the libs out there want to keep it up, I'm fair game. Previously, I posted Conyers reply on DailyKOS called "The Facts".
However, many of these "facts" seem to directly contradict this Michael Smith interview. This was an exclusive interview conducted by DowningStreetMemo.com.
For example, Conyers claims that the memos exist. However, Smith claims they he handed the originals back to the government for legal purposes (after photocopying them). He then had them retyped and destroyed the photocopies. But first he scanned "two or three" pages of the photocopies and put them in his September 18, 2004 Daily Telegraph article (pictured previously in this blog).
How can Conyers claim that the memos exist? He doesn't have them. Smith doesn't have them. Did Conyers call London and get access to top secret British documents?
Can't get the story straight?
Home of the ReBirTheRs
No comments:
Post a Comment