Monday, November 28, 2005

Cindy Sheehan book signing bust?



Actual AP headline:

Anti-war activist Cindy Sheehan waits for people to show up at her book signing near President Bush's ranch on Saturday, Nov. 26, 2005 in Crawford, Texas. Sheehan, whose 24-year-old Casey died in Iraq, called for anti-war activists to return to Crawford this week as Bush celebrated the Thanksgiving holiday. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)

Sunday, November 27, 2005

An hour drive is "nearby"?

Murtha doesn’t actually represent Altoona; he represents nearby Johnstown...


First of all, Altoona is in Blair County. Johnstown is in Cambria county.

While these two counties are nearby, the cities within those counties are not too close. According to Mapquest, the drive from Altoona to Johnston (in Cambria) is a 55 minute drive.

Tuesday, November 15, 2005

Harry Reid flip-flops on Bush support?

Thursday, October 10, 2002


WASHINGTON, D.C. - In a speech on the Senate floor today, U.S. Senator Harry Reid declared his support for a Congressional Resolution that will give President Bush the authority to do what he feels necessary to prevent Saddam Hussein from developing and using weapons of mass destruction.

http://reid.senate.gov/record2.cfm?id=187665

Sunday, November 13, 2005

Gil gets bumped to the Perspective page!

A Smart move - for Dowd too.

If you’re looking for Gil Smart’s “Smart Remarks’’ column on B1 today, it’s not there.

For those of you who find Mr. Smart hard to take, don’t start planning a statue in my honor. You would be taking too much for granite.

And to fans of Mr. Smart, don’t get upset and break out your “Free Gil’’ signs as you’ve promised to do if he is among the missing.

Mr. Smart’s column now resides on the first page of the Perspective section. On the left side of the page.


(chorus of angels sing)

Hallelujah! Hallelujah!

Hall-e-lu-jah!

Friday, November 11, 2005

Bush responds to critics of war

http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/11/11/bush.intel/index.html

Media smearing Pat Robertson?

The media appears to have said yesterday that Pat Robertson warned Dover, Pennsylvania with a prediction of a coming disaster.

Some examples:

FOXNEWS: Robertson: God May Smite Pro-Evolution Town
CNN: Pat Robertson warns evolution voters of God's wrath
COMCAST NEWS: Pat Robertson Warns Pa. Town of Disaster
MSNBC: Robertson warns town of disaster...

However, the quote cited doesn't express that.

"I'd like to say to the good citizens of Dover: If there is a disaster in your area, don't turn to God. You just rejected him from your city," Robertson said on the Christian Broadcasting Network's "700 Club."

"And don't wonder why He hasn't helped you when problems begin, if they begin. I'm not saying they will, but if they do, just remember, you just voted God out of your city. And if that's the case, don't ask for His help because he might not be there," he said.

Source

President's Veterans Day speech - watch for it

Sources are saying that President Bush will be making a Veterans' Day speech that responds to Senate Democrats forcing the entire Senate into secret, closed-door sessions involving pre-war intelligence.

Once the speech is made and a transcript is available, I will post a link to it on this blog.

Saturday, November 05, 2005

Gil can't count, now he can't calculate, either

http://local.lancasteronline.com/4/18383

From this, Gil is claiming that if the Iraq War continued for a decade, that we would have 10,000 "dead Americans" that were lost in "carnage" and "bloodletting".

First of all, this is another attempted mislead in that the number is derived from the 2,000 figure over two years and mathematically reaching 10,000 over 10 years.

It's an erroneous assumption that assumes no rate of change in the number of fatalities.

The same type of erroneous assumption appears to have been made in estimating the costs of the extended war.

Some things have already been paid in the first two years. For example, it might have cost money to bring resources to Iraq - resources that are already now there. Also, prices can change. What if some resources are no longer needed? It's possible that the rates of cost could change, as well.

This type of mathematics is highly erroneous and are not good "guesstimates" as to potential costs of lives or money for a decade-long Iraq War (if it were to last that long).

Secondly, there is a problem with the phrase "carnage and bloodletting", because about 1,600 American troops have been killed in Iraq by "hostile acts" in the two years of the war. The remainder were killed in something called "non-combat situations".

That also throws off these numbers, even though they are erred already.

Mathematically speaking, I can say that Gil is way off base. Take this from a Penn State graduate emphasizing in mathematics.

Thursday, November 03, 2005

Proof Joe Wilson outted Valerie Plame

Source

Start with Joe Wilson, retired diplomat turned consultant. On July 6 he writes a column telling the world that he has done some consulting for the CIA. That might reasonably be expected to attract the attention of the spychasers of various foreign intelligence services.

As these spychasers study Joe Wilson, what do they learn? A few minutes on the internet would have turned up his on-line bio with his wife's maiden name; a check of FEC records for campaign donations would have revealed that his wife, as "Valerie Wilson", listed "Brewster-Jennings & Associates" as her employer. Elapsed time - ten minutes?

What would our spychasers learn about Brewster-Jennings? Within a week of the Bob Novak article mentioning Brewster-Jennings, the Boston Globe had done some research, sent a person to the Brewster-Jennings office in Boston, and reported that "Apparent CIA front didn't offer much cover".

There were no employees, the building managers knew nothing of the company, and typical state and local records had not been filed. Does that sound like a legitimate enterprise, or a possible front company? Might suspicions have been aroused?


Well-said! It's important to read that Boston Globe article. It contradicts claims going around the Valerie Wilson was a NOC in 1999.

Source


WASHINGTON -- On the same day in 1999 that retired diplomat Joseph Wilson was returned $1,000 of $2,000 he contributed to Democratic presidential candidate Al Gore a month earlier because it exceeded the federal limit, his CIA-employee wife gave $1,000 to Gore using a fictitious identification for herself.

In making her April 22, 1999, contribution, Valerie E. Wilson identified herself as an "analyst" with "Brewster-Jennings & Associates." No such firm is listed anywhere, but the late Brewster Jennings was president of Socony-Vacuum oil company a half-century ago. Any CIA employee working under "non-official cover" always is listed with a real firm, but never an imaginary one.

Fitzgerald: "Nothing wrong" with officials discussing Wilsons or imparting information to Libby

Let me make clear there was nothing wrong with government officials discussing Valerie Wilson or Mr. Wilson or his wife and imparting the information to Mr. Libby.


-Patrick Fitzgerald

Source

Wednesday, November 02, 2005

Obstructionist Democrats "hijack" the Senate, invoke Senate Rule 21



For my next stunt...


Seriously, the Bush nomimnation of Alito will likely be pushed back into next year, even though Bush had challenged the Senate to make a confirmation vote on Alito before year's end.

Who do these Democrats think they are, anyway?

Judge Probed Patrick Fitzgerald for Misconduct

Source

A federal judge in Chicago accused Leakgate Special Counsel Patrick Fitzgerald of prosecutorial misconduct earlier this year and launched an investigation into what he said a misuse of grand jury materials - before Fitzgerald had the probe shut down by a higher court.

In January 2005, U.S. District Judge James F. Holderman accused Fitzgerald's U.S. Attorney's office in Chicago of turning grand jury materials over to a plaintiff's lawyer in a hospital-fraud case, the Associated Press reported at the time.

In addition to threatening to hold one of Fitzgerald's prosecutors in criminal contempt of court, Judge Holderman ordered a misconduct investigation of Fitzgerald and three of his assistants by the Justice Department's Office of Professional Responsibility, according to the Chicago Tribune.

The federal judge asked that Fitzgerald be investigated for "misstating the law and other offenses" by the OPR, the arm of the Justice Department that investigates allegations of wrongdoing by prosecutors.

Fitzgerald took the case to the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals and argued that his office had done nothing illegal.
A three judge panel agreed, ruling that Judge Holderman didn't have jurisdiction to launch a probe of a U.S. attorney.

According to the AP, however, Fitzgerald did acknowledged that his prosecutor should have notified defense attorneys before turning over confidential grand jury materials to the plaintiff's side in the hospital fraud case.

It's not clear whether the Justice Department took any action against Fitzgerald based on Judge Holderman's complaint.

Tuesday, November 01, 2005

Patrick Fitzgerald not a Republican

There is a nasty rumor going around that Patrick Fitzgerald is a Republican.

He is not.

A simple Google search reveals that truthfully (and this has been verified at multiple, legitimate sources) that he was registered Independent in New York, but then re-registered with no political affiliation after he realized Independent was a political party.

When confronted with this, many have been posting that Fitzgerald was appointed by Republicans and Democrats had "nothing to do with it".

Also not true.

First of all, Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., is a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee who was the first Democrat to call for an investigation and ask Ashcroft to appoint a special counsel.

Secondly, the nomination requires a Senate confirmation.

According to:

http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/iln/aboutus/patrickjfizgerald.html

The United States Senate confirmed his nomination by unanimous consent and President Bush signed his commission on October 29, 2001.


His confirmation was on October 23, 2001, during which time Senator Durbin (D) is reported to have aided in having the confirmation proceed.

During that time, according to the Senate website, Democrats were a majority party of the Senate.

Majority Party (June 6, 2001-November 12, 2002 --): Democrat (50 seats)

Minority Party: Republican (49 seats)

Other Parties: 1

Source

So yes, Democrats did have something to do with this special counsel. A whole lot.